Thursday, November 13, 2008
Persuasion
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Sexist language
If I had to respond to this discussion I would say that I agree with the last post by sixpounder. I personally don’t see a big issue with the word ‘girl’, and I certainly think it is more respectful than words like h*, or b****, or sl**. Now if these were the words in use I might have a problem but most sites like myspace and facebook (I don’t know much about Flikr) censor derogatory words. It seems like the woman that started this post is making a mountain out of a molehill because I guess her class has made her more aware and now she is trying to use the new knowledge to assert herself. Kudos to her for trying to make a difference but in our textbook Coopman says that we should try to use non sexist or gender neutral terms to tackle that problem. Her idea for flikr to discourage sexist language by educating is commendable however; I doubt it is high on their list of priorities because it is not their issue. It is an issue of American culture, which is unfortunately also filled with sexism in the media.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Speech Buddies
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Tag questions and hedges
In chapter 10, Coopman talks about using language effectively. In the section about language and gender, he talks about powerless language. He uses speech jargon in identifying concepts such as tag questions and hedges. I have never heard of these concepts but I understand when he connects them to an uncertain way of speaking. However, it bugs me that although he references his evidence for his assertions on gender, they are obviously based on some type of survey or statistic which I cant take as a fact. I do think it is important that he talks about these concepts because it can help us as public speakers identify possible red flag phrases that we never thought may contradict from our speeches.